• Gay BlogAds


  • Gay News Watch


  • Chris Tweets



  • « McCain as 'slick Willie' | Main | GNW 5: UAFA, trans, marriage rights »

    March 04, 2008

    Obama's gay press snub?

    Posted by: Chris

    Ericresnick2007thumb125x177_2 Reporter Eric Resnick of the Gay People's Chronicle has posted an angry column complaining that he was mistreated by Barack Obama's campaign when he sought an interview with the Ohio gay newspaper. Resnick complained that the candidate was not made available for a one-on-one interview and he was treated roughly by Robert Gibbs, Obama's national communications director:

    I wasn't biting on the crap he tried to feed me, and he got offended. When I stood there not writing any of it down, Gibbs said to me, "Let me tell you how this works. I talk and you write down what I say."

    "I'll write down what you say when you answer the question," I responded, adding that "I'm no campaign's stenographer." Gibbs actually took the pen and pad out of my hands and wrote his own answer!

    As someone who edited six gay publications over a ten-year period, I would agree with Resnick that it's important such publications have access to newsmakers, including national political candidates. 

    Unfortunately, Resnick is a walking talking argument for why those publications often don't get the access they rightly deserve. Resnick acknowledges in his column that he was a vocal supporter of Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich's presidential campaign and was even elected as a Kucinich delegate to the Democratic National Convention.

    He may ask rhetorically whether reporters from the New York Times and the Cleveland Plain-Dealer would have been treated as he was by the Obama campaign. But of course neither of those publications would ever think of assigning as a reporter someone who had been elected as a delegate to the Democratic National Convention for another candidate. 

    If the free gay press wants to be taken as seriously as "the big boys," then it ought to play by the same rules. Assign reporters without any connection to any candidate who can ask objective questions. The result will be reporters who are much more respectful than standing in front of the press spokesman for a presidential candidate not writing down what he says. Or saying later in print that they weren't "biting the crap he was trying to feed me."

    Taking accurate quotes from sources is not "campaign stenography," as Resnick alleges; it's reporting.  Reporters almost never like the answers they get from politicians and (especially) their flaks, but it is disrespectful and unprofessional to simply ignore them until you get the answer you want. 

    Hilary_1 Given Resnick's plain bias and his conduct more befitting an activist than a journalist, it's hardly surprising that he didn't get his interview with Obama. Why put the candidate in front of such a loose cannon who shows so little regard for the rules of journalism? I have a lot of respect for the Gay People's Chronicle, but the paper was was very poorly served by Resnick as a reporter.

    Just compare on the one hand Resnick's report in the Gay People's Chron, which fixates on the New Jersey civil unions report and the issue of gay marriage -- even though Clinton and Obama agree on that point -- while making no mention of the fact that Clinton's position in favor of half-repeal of DOMA (which Resnick misstates) is different from Obama's support for full repeal.

    Then, on the other hand, you have Editor Tammye Nash's more extensive and even-handed report in the Dallas Voice, which was based on exactly the same 15-minute phone call with Clinton.

    Clinton should be credited for giving the interview, her second to the "free gay press," though I would note that her other "free gay press" interview was with Kevin Naff, the editor of the Washington Blade, who weeks earlier had endorsed Clinton for president in an editorial.  I have enormous respect for the Blade and for Kevin, but he was the wrong person to do that interview as well.

    |

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834527dd469e200e550acd2e68834

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Obama's gay press snub?:

    1. Cliton supporter gone wild from The Bilerico Project on Apr 6, 2008 9:09:48 PM

      The image there is the cover of Philadelphia Gay News, with a big blank space where the interview with Barack Obama should be. It directs readers to editor Mark Segal's tirade against Obama on pages 11 and 21. I have thoughts on both the interview and ... [Read More]

    Comments

    1. Brian Miller on Mar 5, 2008 2:29:37 AM:

      Sorry, Chris, it's ridiculous spin for the press to claim that it's "unbiased." Much of the LGBTQ press leans Democratic, consistently, and often won't give fair coverage to Libertarians, Greens, Independents or Republicans for that matter. Does that justify those various groups' candidates ignoring the LGBT press as well?

      Obama's campaign is arrogant and has a sense of entitlement blown way out of proportion to its importance and reach. The devastating drubbing that Senator Clinton provided to Obama Tuesday night only underscores this.

    1. Scott on Mar 5, 2008 2:42:44 AM:

      Gay people are NOT subservient to straight people. Many straight people believe that and obviously Robert Gibbs is one of them. Why do they think that? They believe they are pure and purfect while gay people are unnatural, sinful, abominations etc. Everyone learns this straight supremacist bullshit when they grow up. This is why gay people stay in the closet and hate themselves.

      Robert Gibbs would not treat John Lewis this way. John Lewis supported Hillary Clintion until recently. Robert Gibbs OWES Eric Resnick an apology.

    1. Diana on Mar 6, 2008 11:42:02 AM:

      Hi I’m from San Francisco. When Obama visited here in the past, he refused to associate with the mayor who supported civil rights (including gay marriage). But now he is seeking support from these groups… it bothers me that Obama will only befriend people when it’s politically convenient for him. All of San Francisco knows this. Hillary has a much stronger record and has shown that she can come back from adversities. She does not discriminate against anyone. For that and among many, many reasons I’m voting for Hillary.

    1. Jeff Epperly on Mar 11, 2008 11:52:37 AM:

      Chris Crain giving advice on how to be an objective journalist. Now that's funny....

    1. custom glove on May 26, 2011 7:49:44 AM:

      As a supporter, i dont believe that easily on whatever publications are made.

    1. lacoste shoes on Aug 18, 2011 5:06:10 AM:

      Robert Gibbs would not treat John Lewis this way. John Lewis supported Hillary Clintion until recently. Robert Gibbs OWES Eric Resnick an apology.

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    © Citizen Crain - All Rights Reserved | Design by E.Webscapes Design Studio | Powered by: TypePad