• Gay BlogAds


  • Gay News Watch


  • Chris Tweets



  • « The gay verdict on Sotomayor | Main | MSNBC's Anderson Cooper in drag? »

    May 27, 2009

    A wretched ruling that also happens to be right

    Posted by: Chris

    Sfmarriageprotest The ruling yesterday by the California Supreme Court upholding Proposition 8's same-sex marriage ban sent thousands into the streets of San Francisco, Los Angeles and dozens of cities across the country to protest. Long-time activist Robin Tyler, who was a plaintiff in last year's successful suit challenging the state's gay marriage ban and the unsuccessful legal attack this year on Prop 8, didn't mince words.

    "The upholding of Proposition 8 by the court is a cowardly retreat from the pro-equality stance it took last year," said Tyler, "and makes our state a laggard behind pro-equality states like Iowa and most New England states."

    The reason for her frustration is obvious enough. A little more than one year ago, the California high court struck down a ballot initiative banning same-sex marriage as a bias-motivated measure that violated equal protection under the law and impinged on a "fundamental right" guaranteed by the state's Constitution. Six months later, an almost identical ballot initiative called Proposition 8, adopted by an even smaller margin of votes, snatched away that "fundamental right." 

    Confronted with such a naked power play -- a bare majority re-adopting the same ballot initiative found unconstitutional a year earlier -- the California Supreme Court this week just shrugged its shoulders. "There's nothing we can do," the 6-1 majority said, essentially. "It's just really easy to amend our Constitution."

    That’s really what the challenge to Prop 8 came down to -- the very same simple majority of California voters that can adopt a state statute by proposition can also amend the state’s constitution by proposition. It’s a huge flaw in the constitutional design of our most populous and influential state.

    If individual rights are to be protected from the majority abuse, then trampling on a minority should obviously require something more than a simple majority of voters. That’s why the U.S. Constitution and the founding documents of the vast majority of other states don’t let amendments go before the voters at all, or only after they are pre-approved by a legislature, usually by super-majority and often over successive sessions.

    The gay plaintiffs challenging Prop 8, backed by state Attorney General Jerry Brown, tried their best to make an end-run around the easy amendability of the California Constitution, honing in on archaic language that says “amendments” can go before voters but “revisions” have to get the legislature’s OK first.

    Parsing through the difference between an “amendment” and a “revision” is the kind of thing that earns lawyers the revulsion of right-thinking people everywhere. In this case, the court majority got the better of the argument, pointing to an uninterrupted chain of earlier court rulings about what amounts to a “revision.”  

    Despite the best pro-gay efforts of some very smart lawyers, calling Prop 8 a “revision” rather than an “amendment” would require ramming a very square peg down a very round hole.

    It’s very cold comfort, of course, to know that the justices weren’t simply cowardly fearing recall by voters -- another fundamental flaw in California’s legal system -- when they upheld Proposition 8; just like it’s pretty cold comfort that the court didn’t forcibly divorce the 18,000 same-sex couples who married before Prop 8 passed.

    Still, the news isn’t all bad. Politically speaking, it will be much better for the gay rights movement in the long haul to repeal Prop 8 at the ballot box, rather than from the bench. Equality California has already announced plans to put a pro-gay proposition -- call it Prop Anti-8 -- on the 2010 ballot, and this week’s court ruling has at least energized volunteers.

    Tedolsonblog What’s more, this temporary defeat may actually turn into the mother of all victories for same-sex marriage. Just today, two of the most prominent lawyers in the U.S., who just so happened to be on opposite sides of the Bush vs. Gore case back in 2000, have come together to file a federal lawsuit challenging Proposition 8.

    These two strange same-sex bedfellows include Ted Olson, a conservative hero as George W. Bush’s lawyer back in 2000 and subsequently solicitor general for W.’s first term, along with David Boies, Al Gore’s lawyer and the guy who took on Microsoft back in the ’90s for the Clinton Justice Department. Their Prop 8 suit is based on the guarantees of equal protection and due process in the U.S. Constitution, and if successful would in domino fashion strike down gay marriage bans everywhere, along with DOMA, the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

    Even with the involvement of these legal giants, this latest lawsuit is itself a risky gamble, given the conservative state of the judiciary and the precarious balance of power on the U.S. Supreme Court. But if it works, this week’s protesters can take special joy in how Proposition 8 ultimately won the great gay marriage war.

    (Protest photo via San Francisco Chronicle/AP)

    |

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834527dd469e2011570a9dc2e970b

    Comments

    1. Strict Scrutiny on May 28, 2009 1:40:48 AM:

      Thanks for the reasoned and level-headed analysis.

      You know, I can't help but wonder if all the marriage equality statutes and rulings in IA and New England were energized by what happened here in CA. In a funny way, maybe Prop 8's success here in California motivated the folks back east to take action on this important issue.

    1. Mish on May 28, 2009 11:06:48 AM:

      It feels like an episode of The Twilight Zone when Ted Olson sees the obvious constitutional problems with DOMA while a Democratic president, a former professor of constitutional law, seems content to let it ride.

      If the conservative judiciary were the strict constitutionalists they claim to be, this would be a slam dunk legal move. I'd be overjoyed to be just as surprised by their judgment as I have been by Ted Olson.

    1. jamesnimmo on May 28, 2009 12:49:37 PM:

      Perhaps by the time the glacially slow legal process has moved this case to the SCOTUS it will have a composition of justices. But as we've seen with the appointment of Sotomajor, Obama is NOT appointing people you'd think he would have considering his rhetoric during the campaign.

      Considering how Obama has handled the economy, kow-towing for Wall Street, Obama has proved himself to be Souter-like in reverse in that Poppy Bush thought he was getting a conservative when Souter was appointed. some of us who voted for Obama thought we were getting a liberal, when in fact we got a more articulate, smarter, and well-mannered version of a Republican.

    1. Billy Glover on May 28, 2009 3:48:24 PM:

      Anyone who has read gay history and heard the voice of thinkers like Don Slater, co-founder of ONE, Inc and the Homosexual Information Center (and who lived for over 50 years with his partner, Tony) would know that he would agree with this thinking-that this defeat could end up being a victory-and that working through the system is how we got what rights we do have. Go watch that "old" movie, Stonewall.

      While many of us hope the marriage issue will be an educational opportunity, history says that without the education any victory could be worthless in reality.

    1. Pierre on May 28, 2009 3:48:35 PM:

      "this latest lawsuit is itself a risky gamble, given the conservative state of the judiciary and the precarious balance of power on the U.S. Supreme Court"

      Honestly though, what are the chances that this will work?

    1. cheap ugg boots on Nov 21, 2010 9:33:56 PM:

      Please visit this article on Queerty on Window Media. It has to do with our friends at Crain!

      ttp://www.queerty.com/fire-sale-is-david-unger-unloading-all-of-window-media-20090521/

    1. cheap ugg boots on Nov 29, 2010 6:41:21 AM:

      Dude, lighten up. She's out and everyone knows it.

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    © Citizen Crain - All Rights Reserved | Design by E.Webscapes Design Studio | Powered by: TypePad