• Gay BlogAds


  • Gay News Watch


  • Chris Tweets



  • « A revealing Ryan Dobson | Main | The week on GNW (Feb. 21-27) »

    February 26, 2010

    There she is...

    Posted by: Chris

    ... Miss Beverly Hills, a title she gave herself while a resident of Pasadena, trying to "clarify" that she's not literally advocating the execution of gays by saying gays should abide by a passage in Leviticus that urges death to those who have sex with those of the same gender.

    Confused? You've got company. Asked whether gays who find Jesus can stay gay, she resorts to the hair toss after an answer escapes her...

    View more news videos at: http://www.nbclosangeles.com/video.

    (via Joe.My.God)

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834527dd469e20120a8d9d761970b

    Comments

    1. jamesnimmo on Feb 27, 2010 11:04:02 AM:

      It's hilarious if it weren't deadly to hear these fundies pop off their two-bit superstitious beliefs. She either beleives this bible crap that gays should be put to death or she doesn't. She likes to point out the old testament calls for death, yet when she's backed into a corner over this statement she grabs for the new testament charactierization of gee-sus as meek and mild and forgiving.
      She's another example of cafeteria religion: pick and choose what you like and leave the rest.....

    1. cbdcs4u on Mar 1, 2010 6:54:52 AM:

      How does an ugly, self-appointed "Miss Beverly Hills" trollop like her manage to garner so much public air time? I mean, who the hell is she, that her fucked-up, Xtian, biblical interpretations should be of any concern to anyone?

    1. Rik on Mar 1, 2010 3:35:33 PM:

      Once you view the video, the fact the gay community is in such an uproar over her personal religious views is more of a commentary on how fragile the gay community is rather than the insignificant ramblings of a 22 y.o.

    1. cheap ugg boots on Nov 21, 2010 11:27:57 PM:

      Is this new law for actual gay marriage, or the sub standard civil partnerships, or civil unions or life partnerships or such like equivalent?

    1. oakley frogskins on Jul 16, 2011 8:09:30 AM:

      I hope that you can fully support the community's decision. REMOVING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT of any kind restructures the California Constitution and such restructures require a more deliberative revision process.

    1. physican fax solutions on Aug 18, 2011 3:42:54 AM:

      Hope is the least they have. I have faith on them.

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    © Citizen Crain - All Rights Reserved | Design by E.Webscapes Design Studio | Powered by: TypePad