• Gay BlogAds


  • Gay News Watch


  • Chris Tweets



  • « Tea Partiers softer on gays than GOP | Main | Once more into the 'outing' mess »

    April 21, 2010

    Don't cry, Argentina's activist judges

    Posted by: Chris

    Norma Castillo and Ramona arevalo lesbian argentina gay marriage Very encouraging news out of my former home Buenos Aires:

    A judge in Buenos Aires today upheld the validity of the first civil marriage between two women, rejecting the decision of another judge, Martha Gomez Alsina, who had set aside as "null and non-existent" the marriage between the two women, the newspaper La Capital is reporting.

    This is the latest twist in quite the roller coaster ride for Norma Castillo and Ramona Arévalo, who were married after 30 years together, only to see their marriage declared "null and non-existent" by a judge acting at the behest of Roman Catholic lawyers. Now that judge's order has been struck down and a gay group is filing a civil and criminal complaint against the interfering judge for malfeasance.

    It's the same pattern that followed Latin America's first gay marriage, also in Argentina, just last December, which was also later struck down by a second judge, acting at the behest of lawyers from the Catholic Church.

    Unless jurisdiction is a loosey-goosey concept in Argentina, this sort of interference should subject the judges to ethics complaints, at a minimum. These are not appeals court judges, overturning the rulings of lower courts, but judges with entirely different jurisdiction responding to appeals to religion by a church that has no business claiming to be a moral arbiter of anything these days.

    Don't expect to hear any condemnation of this very blatant form of judicial activism from the right. Just like conservatives here in the U.S. are marshaling forces to ask unelected judges to overthrow the will of the people on health care reform and financial regulatory reform -- and just as they already did on campaign finance reform. How will Republican senators question Obama's Supreme Court pick about "judicial activism" and keep a straight face?

    According to the nationwide gay rights group, none of these annulments has any legal effect:

    The Argentinian LGBT Federation reiterated that the ruling confirmed that "no" marriage between persons of the same sex has actually been annulled in the country, La Capital reported.

    "The acts of these judges … besides being a new act of discrimination, do not bear any legal or procedural analysis," the Federation said in a statement. The group reiterated that "all marriages of same-sex couples are still valid and in force" and questioned the conflicting court rulings, saying that "being a judge does not entitle anyone to impose their religious beliefs to the rest of the population."

    "They could not cancel any of the marriages because they do not have the legal authority to do so," said Maria Rachid, president of the Argentinian LGBT Federation. The group called for a ruling by the Supreme Court in these cases so that "these judges are no longer confusing society."

    The question may be resolved before it even reaches the Supreme Court, since it appears the country's parliament may take up legislation as soon as this week that will clarify that marriage rights extend to same-sex couples.

    |

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834527dd469e20133ecce73bb970b

    Comments

    1. Strict Scrutiny on Apr 23, 2010 11:39:04 PM:

      Encouraging news indeed. Yeah, I haven't been able to figure out the jurisdictional questions in these Argentinian marriage cases. It seems there's an endless series of "local"or "municipal" judges that are deciding or overturning cases, perhaps without jurisdiction ... it all seems pretty chaotic. Hopefully we'll have some clarity on this issue soon.

    1. ed hardy women on May 9, 2010 11:51:41 PM:

      Yeah, I haven't been able to figure out the jurisdictional questions in these Argentinian marriage cases.
      I like your article really

    1. PandoraBracelet on Aug 14, 2010 4:14:27 AM:

      I agree with you------Encouraging news indeed. Yeah, I haven't been able to figure out the jurisdictional questions in these Argentinian marriage cases. It seems there's an endless series of "local"or "municipal" judges that are deciding or overturning cases, perhaps without jurisdiction ... it all seems pretty chaotic. Hopefully we'll have some clarity on this issue soon.

    1. Silly Bandz on Sep 14, 2010 2:52:02 AM:

      Are you a fashionable guy? Let us crazy for Silly Bandz, power balance and Zhu Zhu Pets: http://www.toysgiftsrus.com . The big discount and gifts are waiting for you!

    1. louis.vitton on Sep 17, 2010 5:49:36 PM:

      The problem is difficult to understand! Especially in some countries!

    1. cheap ugg boots on Nov 21, 2010 8:39:45 PM:

      That's not valid criticism, Tom. Name one leader worth his/her salt who didn't enjoy attention. No one said that Dan is our savior, but I can only wonder what would happen if he were in charge of the Human Rights Campaign right now.

    1. cheap ugg boots on Nov 22, 2010 4:16:25 AM:

      While his pay scale may seem excessive, it is not when compared to other lobbyist. Besides what is the big deal? As long as he is fighting for human rights, then any pay is fair pay IMHO.

    1. cheap ugg boots on Nov 28, 2010 10:36:39 PM:

      The Catholic Church never ceases to amaze me!

    1. online loans on Jan 6, 2011 12:07:31 PM:

      Nice blog. I got a lot of good data. I’ve been following this technology for awhile. It’s interesting how it keeps changing, yet some of the core components remain the same. Have you seen much change since Google made their latest acquisition in the domain?

    1. nfl jerseys discount on Mar 9, 2011 3:49:33 AM:

      The Catholic Church never ceases to amaze me!

    1. nhl jerseys on Jun 27, 2011 12:33:58 AM:

      Couldn't agree more...Had a post already written about this too, (good job i checked around first)never mind.It is a really good tune though. Here's hoping more labels wise up and do this.

    1. Coach Outlet on Jul 7, 2011 2:38:28 AM:

      An excellent article!I like it.but The meaning of the last paragraph a bit puzzled.

    1. Escorts Manchester on Jul 7, 2011 4:32:53 PM:

      Cant believe this is still such a big issue in 2011?

    1. Alex Rodriguez Jersey on Jul 11, 2011 3:59:03 AM:

      Director Jeff Lau's film In appending, this work also permit supporting player Vincent Zhao gradually toward the martial arts star. Is not longer the romantic amphitheatre, but everywhere, everywhere, killings everywhere trading nameless destiny of the die, no one is the champion of this game forever, but only a temporary medalist. few classic lines.

    1. Kami on Aug 11, 2011 5:33:24 PM:

      You are right to remind us that judges are there to interpret and enforce the laws of the land, whether they like them or not.

    1. gucci clothing on Aug 14, 2011 12:36:24 PM:

      .Had a post already written about this too, (good job i checked around first)never mind.It is a really good tune though. Here's hoping more labels wise up and do this.

    1. lynda on Sep 18, 2011 11:31:01 AM:

      Now it's quite common to see judgments being challenged in the court again. And marriage of any kind being a serious thing people go all out to prove their point.

    1. steelers Jersey on Oct 11, 2011 8:40:26 AM:

      The article is very good, I like it very much.Here I learned a lot, then I will pay more attention to you

    1. merchant account services on Dec 13, 2011 9:59:35 AM:

      Im so proud of them. They are true heroes.

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    © Citizen Crain - All Rights Reserved | Design by E.Webscapes Design Studio | Powered by: TypePad