• Gay BlogAds

  • Gay News Watch

  • Chris Tweets

  • « Momentum for marriage and civil unions | Main | Don't ask when DADT will be gone »

    February 13, 2010

    The return of the yuck factor

    Posted by: Chris

    Nancy elliott new hampshire anal sex gay marriage
    Since rational arguments never fail to convince fair-minded folks to exclude gay and lesbian Americans from the fundamental freedom to marry, its foes typically resort to the "yuck factor," and in doing so give us an unintended glimpse of the ignorance behind their bigotry.

    In years gone by, the yuck factor typically took the form of two men in tuxedos or two women in wedding gowns, exchanging vows. Happily marrying same-sex couples in Massachusetts, California took care of that old canard, showing the universal feelings of love and caring that form the bonds in our relationships, just like in opposite-sex couples.

    Then came same-sex kisses, but they've lost their shock value due to Hollywood's more realistic portrayals on TV and the movies, along with the increased frequency of airport and sidewalk smooches -- again showing we're just like our straight brethren.

    That means gay marriage opponents have to up the ante once again on the yuck factor, but I'm guessing this particular attempt by one Republican state rep in New Hampshire won't catch on:

    New Hampshire state Rep. Nancy Elliott (R-Hillsborough) has asked other members of the House Judiciary Committee to repeal the recently enacted gay marriage law. Her argument? Anal sex between gay men is yucky.

    "We're talking about taking the penis of a man and putting it in the rectum of another man and wriggling it around in excrement," said Elliott. "And you have to think, would I want that to be done to me?"

    Elliott didn't stop there, complaining that marriage equality will result in public schools "showing presentations of anal sex. … They are showing our fifth graders how they can actually perform this kind of sex. … That is the context of the lesson, that 'This is something that you, as a fifth grader, you may want to try.'"

    Not only is Elliott's portrayal of anal sex grossly inaccurate (pun intended), it is of course completely irrelevant to whether gays should be able to marry, anymore than Nancy's right to marry should hinge on whether we're grossed out by imagining her lying back and thinking of New England with her partner.

    Raising the sex education boogeyman is straight out of the Prop 8 playbook, and let's hope activists in New Hampshire are more effective in putting the lie to that falsehood.

    Not surprisingly, Elliott's allies have yanked the YouTube video after a round of well-deserved Internet scoffing:

    Apparently they discovered the yuck factor can backfire (pun intended) on those sleazy and cynical enough to employ it.



    TrackBack URL for this entry:


    1. jamesnimmo on Feb 14, 2010 10:55:44 AM:

      Women before menopause bleed from the vagina about four days in every thirty days. There are even religious proscriptions about having any association with mensturating women. Perhaps Nacy Elliot should be advancing a bill requiring mensturating women to wear signs indicating where they are in their reproductive periods.
      Talk about PMS.....

    1. cheap ugg boots on Nov 22, 2010 2:58:22 AM:

      It may be progress, but it is still crushing to know that 152,029,862 people in this country oppose our relationship recognition. Half of the people you encounter will be blatantly heterosexist.

    1. cheap uggs on Nov 29, 2010 2:09:56 AM:

      And what are HRC and The Task Force doing about the issue? But then why is support and media attention not being given to SLDN and what other organizations that might be working in the field of homosexuals and the military?

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    © Citizen Crain - All Rights Reserved | Design by E.Webscapes Design Studio | Powered by: TypePad